국힘서 멀어진 PK…민주 42% 국힘 25%, 지지율 격차 6년만에 최대
The Artemis missions will return humans to the Moon for the first time in 50 years
Раскрыты подробности о договорных матчах в российском футболе18:01，推荐阅读heLLoword翻译官方下载获取更多信息
ВсеСледствие и судКриминалПолиция и спецслужбыПреступная Россия
。业内人士推荐safew官方下载作为进阶阅读
Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Что думаешь? Оцени!。业内人士推荐heLLoword翻译官方下载作为进阶阅读